- Con'd Again?!!!
Posted, 11/13/2009 11:01:13 AM (this time I'll see how long it takes the G&M to take the post down)Ottawa Notebook, Disrespecting veterans?, Jane Taber, November 12, 2009
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/disrespecting-veterans/article1360873/ Tab 17
I have always tried to figure out the date and time of E-mails and it seems they are always off by a number of hours, even if it took only seconds to receive. Anyone with the explanation please let me know.
However, I am very skeptical if the time difference is exactly one day, what are the chances.
PS. last week my post (see: cicblog.com/comments.html) to Jane Taber's "Ottawa Notebook" was taken down, without explanation of course. I can only thing it was because I was critical of the format and content. With this article my opinion has not changed one iota - I mean, come on, is this article for real.
It couldn't have been taken down because I wrote:
"Reading Taber's article, it is so lopsided and off point, one can only wonder to what extent, given the huge amounts of tax payers money, as well as Con Party money, Harper spends on media - central to the smooth running of their propaganda machine, the Harper and Con largess is tied to media that publish pro-Con materials. I would not put this beyond the reach of Harper and the Con's, everything considered, although I would be a bit disappointed and a bit outraged by such 'Actions' by the media. The only thing I can be certain of is, of course, that the truth will not be forthcoming from either the Con's or the media."
Since I posted a similar comment to Joan Bryden's article two days later (and pointing out the trend in articles).
So it must have been my intro "Taber get a new format, this one bites! - or at least something about it bites!"
All I can say is, Ms. Taber, go to . . .
Ignatieff 'quality guy,' Flanagan says, by: Frances Russell, 12/11/2009
winnipegfreepress.com
for real political commentating.
Lloyd MacIlquham cicblog.com/comments.html
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/disrespecting-veterans/article1360873/ Tab 17
I have always tried to figure out the date and time of E-mails and it seems they are always off by a number of hours, even if it took only seconds to receive. Anyone with the explanation please let me know.
However, I am very skeptical if the time difference is exactly one day, what are the chances.
PS. last week my post (see: cicblog.com/comments.html) to Jane Taber's "Ottawa Notebook" was taken down, without explanation of course. I can only thing it was because I was critical of the format and content. With this article my opinion has not changed one iota - I mean, come on, is this article for real.
It couldn't have been taken down because I wrote:
"Reading Taber's article, it is so lopsided and off point, one can only wonder to what extent, given the huge amounts of tax payers money, as well as Con Party money, Harper spends on media - central to the smooth running of their propaganda machine, the Harper and Con largess is tied to media that publish pro-Con materials. I would not put this beyond the reach of Harper and the Con's, everything considered, although I would be a bit disappointed and a bit outraged by such 'Actions' by the media. The only thing I can be certain of is, of course, that the truth will not be forthcoming from either the Con's or the media."
Since I posted a similar comment to Joan Bryden's article two days later (and pointing out the trend in articles).
So it must have been my intro "Taber get a new format, this one bites! - or at least something about it bites!"
All I can say is, Ms. Taber, go to . . .
Ignatieff 'quality guy,' Flanagan says, by: Frances Russell, 12/11/2009
winnipegfreepress.com
for real political commentating.
Lloyd MacIlquham cicblog.com/comments.html
posted by wlloydm at
9:15 AM
<< Home